Student Voice: Essential Ingredient to Decisions on School Start Times

Cropped shot of a group of unrecognizable
Image credit: iStock

The average high school start time in the United States is 8:02 a.m., with five in six high schools starting before the recommended 8:30.[1] Limited transportation exacerbates this problem, with many districts opting for a three-tiered bussing system. Under this strain, many districts go to the extreme. Nevada’s Clark County School District, the nation’s fifth largest, starts nearly every high school at 7 a.m. As a result, some students get picked up for school as early as 5:55.

Adolescence is a key time in the development of teens’ brains, and sufficient sleep is necessary for this development.[2] Additionally, their natural sleep cycle shifts to later in the night, favoring later rest and rise times. Communities nationwide have pressed for healthier start times for high schools, with mixed reactions from school leadership.

Although most state boards of education have little direct control over start times, they can provide guidance and compel local districts to make decisions most aligned with the community’s needs. Over the past year and a half, the Nevada State Board of Education has sought to nudge start times closer to what is conducive to learning and growth, and it has reached out to students—those whom early start times hurt the most.

Students must be part of these discussions. Although student voice may seem elusive, we have learned in Nevada that multiple strategies work well to give adult policymakers a glimpse into their lives. The first, and I believe most important, is having a student voice on the state board. Although it is meaningful for an adult member to advocate for students, it is important to have students speak on their own behalf to ensure their voice is heard as intended. Many state boards nationwide have student members, with a few having two, such as the Pennsylvania State Board of Education.[3]

It is important to have students speak on their own behalf to ensure their voice is heard as intended.

In addition to providing a firsthand account of how the school system responds to student needs, a student member can catalyze student voice movements and respond to initiatives that are before the state board, including changing school start times. As a state board member, I feel I have improved my board’s understanding of the topic, and as the only student voice in the room, I became an advocate for change. With my experience and tenacity, I have been able to motivate my board to find a solution.

Direct interaction with students during school visits and community events is also invaluable. Such visits offer opportunities for board members to hear firsthand accounts, learn more about a situation under discussion, and consider factors they may not have thought about before. It can lay the groundwork for discussion boards may decide to pursue. Discussions with my peers across Nevada afforded me an in-depth knowledge of how early some students have to get up to go to school, particularly those attending magnet schools that require longer travel than for students attending schools in their zones.

Moreover, after talking with students in rural communities with a four-day school week, it became apparent that an earlier start time was necessary for their schools, as pushing it later would extend the school day to go unreasonably late. The state board was then able to consider that information as we started the conversation about regulations governing start times. Without the benefit of individual stories and student experiences, the conversation could have sparked action that did not benefit all students and put some at a disadvantage.

Boards need survey data that draws on a large sample of students, staff, and community members.

As the conversation develops, boards need survey data that draws on a large sample of students, staff, and community members. These data help board members understand what the community thinks and help persuade local districts, other board members, or legislators to act. My board is still working on its survey, but the process of formulating it has yielded a few lessons:

  • First, keep the survey as impartial as possible to maintain its efficacy. It is extremely important to get views as they are and not—as unintentional as it may be—to lead respondents to answer a certain way. Thus, board conversation can focus on actual survey results and not biases in construction of the survey.
  • A second consideration is conciseness. Many students may not have time to complete a 10-minute survey, so it becomes a balancing act between getting quality data and keeping questions to a minimum.
  • Third, the survey should be accessible. Making sure it can be translated to multiple languages can help students and families from different backgrounds have their voices heard.

As with many educational issues, some leaders are quite vocal in their opinions. But it is the students’ voices—oftentimes the quieter voices—that matter most. I cannot speak for other states, but in Nevada, what we hear directly from students is different from what we hear from other leadership.

As they start to navigate independently, high school students’ lives are often turbulent. They are expected to keep up their grades, participate in extracurricular activities and sports, sometimes work part-time jobs, care for younger siblings, and more. State boards can and should listen to their needs and guarantee that students not only have access to high-quality instruction but can come to class prepared to learn.

Michael Keyes is the student state board member for Nevada.

Notes

[1] Rhoda Au et al., “School Start Times for Adolescents,” Policy Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Pediatrics 134, no. 3 (September 2014).

[2] Leila Tarokh, Jared M. Salein, and Mary A. Carskadon, “Sleep in Adolescence: Physiology, Cognition, and Mental Health,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 70 (2016): 182–88.

[3] Celina Pierrottet, “Engaging Youth in Education Policymaking,” Policy Updates 29, no. 6 (Alexandria, VA: NASBE, August 2022).





Also In this Issue

Child using system AI Chatbot in computer or mobile application. Chatbot conversation, Ai Artificial Intelligence technology. OpenAI generate. Futuristic technology. Virtual assistant on internet.

State Education Policy and the New Artificial Intelligence

By Glenn M. Kleiman and H. Alix Gallagher

The technology is new, but the challenges are familiar.





Mixed race group of excited students sitting in a computer lab at school and using virtual reality goggles.

Opportunities and Challenges: Insights from North Carolina’s AI Guidelines

By Vera Cubero

Early guidance helps all schools seize the technology’s potential and mitigate the risks.





A young girl is sitting on the floor in a library, looking at her tablet. There are other children in the background, also looking at their tablets.

Connecting the National Educational Technology Plan to State Policy: A Roadmap for State Boards

By Julia Fallon

State leaders can use the plan to gauge whether their policies are expanding technology access, teachers’ capacity, and the learning experience.





Elementary School Science Class: Over the Shoulder Little Boy and Girl Use Laptop with Screen Showing Programming Software. Physics Teacher Explains Lesson to a Diverse Class full of Smart Kids

Navigating Systemic Access to Computer Science Learning

By Janice Mak

Real advances to broaden participation in K-12 computing will come when state boards take a 360-degree view.






Pennsylvania State Capital Dome

Ensuring Student Data Privacy through Better Governance

By Paige Kowalski

State boards should champion laws to stand up robust cross-agency boards and advocate for best practice.





Advanced child sitting at computer, IT literacy lessons for children, education

Advancing Policy to Foster K-12 Media Literacy

By Samia Alkam and Daniela DiGiacomo

Some state leaders are moving to provide students with what they need to better navigate the digital world. More should.





Flat vibrant vector illustration depicting information technology danger education.

Shielding Student Data: The Critical Role of State Boards in K-12 Cybersecurity

By Reg Leichty

A coordinated push is needed to ward off increased threats and mounting costs.







Note

Featured Items

Image of a black man voting. Credit: Canva

State Education Elections in 2024 Yield Few Shifts

Voters in nine states, three territories, and the District of Columbia elected 64 state board candidates.
Cropped shot of elementary school children using a tablet in class i

Technology in Education

Savvy state leaders will set their sights on ways to broaden access to technology’s benefits, solve problems confronting educators, and protect students against the risks of misuse.
i

Developing Content Standards: A Foundational Task for State Boards

State boards of education typically play a central role in approving academic content standards, though their authority varies by state. This boardsmanship review outlines guiding principles and common processes to help state boards develop high-quality standards.

Upcoming Events

From the States